Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Cover Letter indicating the purpose of the review: tenure contract renewal and/or promotion
  • Self-evaluation form: The faculty candidate identifies a rating of own performance (Not Achieved, Competent, Proficient, or Outstanding) for each domain, with a supporting explanation of the evidence. The candidate may also speak to current areas of focus in his/her professional development and contributions to the department/university.
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Class Visit Forms: the faculty member places two signed class visit forms in the dossier; a departmental/program faculty member must complete one form.
  • Course Evaluation Summaries
  • Statement of Faith and Life (depth of updating is at the discretion of the applicant)
  • Annual goals reports from prior 3 years
  • Faith integration paper (for the initial tenured six-year contract only). The integration paper is 5-10 pages in length and is also shared with peers at an appropriate venue, as arranged by the Provost (not a part of the review process). The faculty candidate addresses how his/her teaching and scholarship is influenced by serving at Eastern Mennonite University, a Christian institution in the Anabaptist tradition. In addition, it should explore the question of affinity with the university mission. A guidelines document is available from the Provost and the Faculty Employee webpage.
  • Supporting Evidence at Faculty Discretion: optional supporting evidence may be offered to assist in demonstrating the level of performance. Duplication of evidence is unnecessary. Supporting evidence may include, but is not limited to:
    • evidence of teaching strategies or curriculum development
    • sample syllabi
    • evidence of student learning
    • published scholarship
    • evidence of service assignments
    • reports generated by consulting or other professional service
    • internal/external letters of recommendation
    • evidence of public critique or adoption of one’s scholarly work

...