Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. By April 1 prior to the first three-year contract, the respective dean contacts the faculty member and their program director indicating it is time for the review process. 
  2. By April 15, the program director sends a letter to the dean, indicating program support for the faculty and anticipated need for the faculty member’s on-going service to the program, as well as clarification of performance expectations and contributions in the domains of Service and Scholarship.
  3. By May 1, based on a letter of support from the program director, the dean sends a letter of eligibility for a three-year contract to the faculty member. The dean’s letter also outlines the review process. The letter is copied to the program director.
  4. By October 1, the faculty member submits a portfolio of the following materials to the dean:
    1. class-visit evaluation form This class-visit evaluation form should be completed by at least one tenure-track or a long-term colleague, which includes a meeting with the faculty member to review the results. The observer submits the class-visit evaluation form to the dean with a copy to the faculty member.
    2. completed self-evaluation, reflecting on achievements, contributions, and areas for growth in the domains of Teaching and Service;
    3. current CV;
    4. affirmation of the Life Together document;
    5. Personal Statement of Faith & Life (for subsequent contracts, an update or affirmation);
    6. Annual Professional Development Goals, in which student evaluations are addressed, from the preceding two years (for subsequent contracts, the preceding three years).
  5. By November 1, the dean reviews the materials submitted, in consultation with (other long-term) members of the program and the program director. 
  6. By November 15, the dean meets with the faculty member to discuss strengths and concerns or areas for growth.
  7. By November 30, the dean submits the completed faculty candidate materials along with a recommendation memo to the provost.   
  8. By January 15, the dean reviews the submitted report in consultation with the provost and notifies the faculty candidate and program director of the outcome of the review.

...